Get help for ENGL
123 Entire Course of
Embry Riddle Aeronautical University. We provide assignment, homework, discussions and case
studies help for all subjects of Embry Riddle Aeronautical University for
Session 2018-2019.
We are
providing ENGL 123 Homework help, Study material, Notes,
Documents, and ENGL
123 Write
ups to the students of Embry
Riddle Aeronautical University. Just question answer is one of the
best assignment helper of Advanced Studies in Introduction to ENGL 123 English
Composition Embry Riddle Aeronautical University (ENGL
123).
Provides:
-
ENGL
123 Week 1 Discussion 1 | Assignment Help | Embry Riddle Aeronautical
University
Introduce Yourself
Write an introduction
about yourself for the rest of the class. In your post, please tell us the
following:
Your name (any
nickname), which program you are pursuing with Embry-Riddle, what you do when
you are not in class, and any other details about yourself you wish to share.
In addition, explain
something you hope to learn in ENGL 123. In your answer, use at least three of
these words: critical, fortunately, hopefully, knowledge, and writing.
Attach a picture of
yourself to your introduction if you wish.
Return to this
discussion throughout the week to engage in a dialogue with your classmates.
While you may respond to as many classmates as you would like, strike up a
conversation with at least two before the end of the module week.
Be sure to set up your Canvas
Profile (Links to an external site.)Links to an external site. and update your
Canvas account settings so you not only get notifications about this and all
ERAU courses, but you will also allow everyone to know who they are
communicating with during these discussions. Review this video (06:28) (Links
to an external site.)Links to an external site. for help with the profile
settings.
ENGL
123 Week 1 Discussion 2 | Assignment Help | Embry Riddle Aeronautical
University
Self-Reflection
Reflect on how you feel
about writing. Love it? Hate it? Tolerate it? Avoid it? By the end of the
second class day, share your current feelings about writing by comparing
writing, as you experience it, to a food.
Complete this sentence:
For me, writing is like (name of food) because (why).
Don't be afraid to be
brutally honest! If for you, writing is like moldy bread because it makes you
feel sick when you think about it, that's fine. Or maybe for you, writing is like
M&Ms because you never know what's going to pop out of your mind. Or maybe
writing is like raw onions because it makes you cry.
Be sure to post your
initial post early in the week. Have some fun and return to the discussion
later this week to read how some of your classmates view writing. Respond to at
least two of your classmates.
ENGL
123 Week 1 Discussion 3 | Assignment Help | Embry Riddle Aeronautical
University
How Do You Write?
Students often find
that getting started is the most difficult task in the writing process.
Certainly, nothing is more frustrating or unsettling than staring at a blank
computer screen or poring over a clean sheet of paper. The writing community
fortunately has devised various invention or pre writing techniques to help
writers select topics and generate ideas that help them get on track with the
writing process. Brainstorming – essentially writing whatever comes to mind –
is one of the more common methods. See pages 53-64 of your textbook for other
invention strategies.
Everyone has his or her
own system of getting the creative juices flowing that includes selecting a
topic, gathering the information, organizing the material, and finding the
right conditions under which to compose. What system works best for you?
Share with the class
how you get your writing projects in gear. How do you decide what to write
about? How do you choose a topic? What means do you use to develop supporting
ideas?
Describe your optimal
writing conditions. Is there a time of day when you’re more effective? Do you
prefer working in isolation or in the company of others? Are you more
productive composing at a keyboard or with pen and paper?
Some times we learn
best from what does not work. Explain ineffective techniques that you might
have used in the past. What can be done
to improve the process?
ENGL
123 Week 2 Discussion 1 | Assignment Help | Embry Riddle Aeronautical
University
Rhetorical Strategy:
Using Sense Details
In this module, you
will be asked to profile or describe a place you have visited. Think about a
possible place for the assignment and complete the following activity:
For one minute, focus
on the sense of sight. Make a list of everything you can remember about what
you saw at this place.
For another minute:
shift to the sense of hearing. Make a list of everything you remember hearing
at this place. Instead of identifying the source of the sound (bird, drum,
etc.), describe it (chirping, beating, etc.).
For the next 30
seconds, shift to the sense of smell. Make a list of everything you can
remember about the smells at this place or any sensations in your nose you
might remember, such as dryness or dustiness, or tickling.
For the next 30
seconds, shift to the sense of taste. Make a list of everything you can
remember tasting or any sensations in your mouth you might remember.
For one more minute,
shift to the sense of touch. Make a list of any tactile sensations you experienced
in this place, the feeling of your clothing against your skin, the hardness or
softness of your chair, a breeze, humidity, etc.
For your posting,
provide your place and list one detail for each sense: sight, hearing, smell,
taste, and touch.
Learn and Share activities: These activities
are set up using the discussion tool so you can share your activities with your
classmates. While replies to your classmates' posts are not required for these
activities, feel free to ask them questions or share further ideas. These
activities are graded as pass/fail. You will earn 100 points for completing the
activity or 0 points if you do not complete the activity.
ENGL
123 Week 2 Discussion 2 | Assignment Help | Embry Riddle Aeronautical
University
The Use of Personal
Anecdotes
Personal anecdotes,
"mini-memoirs" (as explained on page 96 of your textbook), are very
brief stories about a personal experience or incident that can serve a variety
of purposes. For example, anecdotes, frequently used in introductions, can attract
your reader's attention, add a personal touch, make your reader ponder a topic
more, provide a lesson, set the stage for the rest of the writing, etc.
Essentially, personal anecdotes can establish your credibility (ethos), engage
your audience emotionally (pathos), and provide an example to support a point
(logos).
Share a personal
anecdote about yourself with your classmates about a lesson learned, your
personal credo, a memorable day, an embarrassing moment, or a funny incident.
Since anecdotes should be brief, keep your anecdote to no more than 350 words.
Use active verbs (i.e. raced, dabbled, screeched, stumbled, ranted, laughed,
etc.) instead of passive verbs (i.e. was laughing, were singing, became, seemed
to be, etc.).
Be sure to post your
initial post early in the week. After you have posted, go back to the
discussion and read several of your classmates' responses. Respond to at least
two postings.
ENGL
123 Week 3 Discussion 1 | Assignment Help | Embry Riddle Aeronautical
University
Asking Questions
View the Portrait de
famille (Links to an external site.)Links to an external site. (Family
Portrait) by Dorothea Tanning.
After analyzing it,
post at least two interesting questions about the image.
Learn and Share activities: These activities
are set up using the discussion tool so you can share your activities with your
classmates. While replies to your classmates' posts are not required for these
activities, feel free to ask them questions or share further ideas. These
activities are graded as pass/fail. You will earn 100 points for completing the
activity or 0 points if you do not complete the activity.
ENGL
123 Week 3 Discussion 2 | Assignment Help | Embry Riddle Aeronautical
University
Creating Verbal Images
Shapes, colors, size,
shadows, and positions are just a few of the elements that one may analyze to
determine what a visual image means. When writing text, it is important that
you create a visual picture for your reader to get across your meaning. One way
to do this is by using figurative language involving the comparison of two
unlike items.
The object of this
exercise is to create comparisons between two items, being as creative and
descriptive as you can.
Give yourself one
minute for each sentence.
Example: How is a piece
of pizza like a piece of chalk?
Answers:
Both come in boxes with
other, similarly shaped pieces.
Both come in different
colors and shapes.
Both can stain your
clothes.
You can write a
message, if you need to, with either of them.
Okay, now you try.
Remember, one minute each.
How is a computer like
a picture?
How is concrete like
chocolate?
How is an airplane like
a cloud?
Learn and Share activities: These activities
are set up using the discussion tool so you can share your activities with your
classmates. While replies to your classmates' posts are not required for these
activities, feel free to ask them questions or share further ideas. These
activities are graded as pass/fail. You will earn 100 points for completing the
activity or 0 points if you do not complete the activity.
ENGL
123 Week 3 | Assignment Help | Embry Riddle Aeronautical University
Visual Analysis
Find an advertisement,
cartoon, or image on the Internet that depends predominantly (if not entirely)
on visual appeals to market a product or make a point. First, identify the
central message of this visual. Then, note and discuss how the marketers, cartoonists,
or graphic designers seem to have employed visual elements to persuade readers
to think a certain way. The more knowledge you have about target readers for
the visual, the more effectively you’ll be able to explain the strategies
employed to sell the product or point. In addition, analyze the effectiveness
(or ineffectiveness) of the visual elements and explain what you learned from
writing the analysis.
In your introduction,
describe the image you are analyzing and the central idea. Include either a
copy of the image or a link to where the image can be found. Also, include a
thesis statement that reflects the content of your analysis.
In the body of the
analysis, discuss the elements used in the visual to get the reader to think a
certain way. You might discuss visual elements like shapes, colors, size,
shadows, and positions to name a few. Also, discuss the effectiveness (or
ineffectiveness) of the visual elements.
End with a brief
conclusion that summarizes what you have learned from completing the visual
analysis.
Be sure to double-space
your assignment.
Length: 400 - 450 words
Save your assignment
using a naming convention that includes your first and last name and the
activity number (or description). Do not add punctuation or special characters.
ENGL
123 Week 4 Assignment Help 1 | Embry Riddle Aeronautical University
Draft Due & Peer
Review
Overview
“Criticism, like rain,
should be gentle enough to nourish a man’s growth without destroying his
roots.” – Frank Clark
For this assignment,
you will summarize an editorial (opinion) piece found using the Internet. Then,
you will write a letter to the editor in response to the editorial. It is not
necessary to respond to every point in the editorial—and probably not possible.
You may respond to only one point if you wish.
Note: Since this is a
personal response, you may write in first person by using "I" in your
writing.
Questions you might ask yourself:
What is the author
saying?
How does the author go
about saying it (i.e. the evidence, rhetorical strategies, and the like)?
What is your evaluation
of what is written and how it is written?
You will also complete
two peer reviews of your classmates' submissions.
Directions
Assignment Submission
Your letter to the
editor has two parts: a summary of the editorial and a strong response. For the
potential for full credit for this assignment, you must do four things:
Summarize the editorial
in 150-175 words. Be sure you present the thesis and the major supporting
points in an objective manner (i.e. do not insert your opinions).
Identify the editorial
and author in the first sentence of your summary and include the link for your
readers.
Write a response to the
editor in 250-300 words. In your response, you may agree with one or two
points, but you must also show how you "resist" the text by
questioning it, or arguing with it or refuting it. It may be helpful to think
of your response as a reaction to how the writer was trying to influence your
thinking. Pay attention to the words used to name and describe, the details
included, and any comparisons made. (The letter-to-the-editor format assumes
readers have read the article, so you do not need to summarize it in the
letter.)
Correctly use
attributive tags in your response to indicate which ideas came from the press
release and which are your own.
You will submit a draft by the fourth day of
this module so there is time to complete the peer reviews. After an instructor
and peer review, revise and submit the final version in Module 5.
Save your assignment
using a naming convention that includes your first and last name and the
activity number (or description). Do not add punctuation or special characters.
Peer Review
On the fifth day of the
module week, after you have submitted your assignment, you will be assigned to
conduct a peer review on two of your classmates' papers. You must complete the
two peer reviews by the third day of the next module week (Module 5). This will
allow you and your classmates time to work on your paper and implement feedback
from your classmates and instructor.
Please consider the
following attributes upon submission of peer review:
Always reread your
written observation before submitting.
Give detail responses
that generate more in-depth conversations on the subject.
Remaining professional,
discuss the strengths/weaknesses of the submission.
Provide clear
suggestions and praise when necessary.
ENGL
123 Week 5 Assignment Help | Embry Riddle Aeronautical University
Annotated Bibliography
The Annotated
Bibliography is designed to give you practice in locating sources, evaluating
sources, and listing sources correctly in a references list according to APA
style.
In Modules 6, 7, and 8,
you will be working on the Classical Argument Assignment. For this module, you
will not write a paper, but simply compile a reference list with annotations.
It is suggested, but not necessary, that you select the topic you will argue in
the Classical Argument Assignment.
Follow the example at
the bottom of the assignment. List each source in correct APA format and
include a brief summary of the information you find in each source, along with
a brief evaluation of the source.
If you find a book or a
long article, do not read the entire thing. Look at the chapters in the book to
create a summary. Look for an abstract of the article, or for subtitled
sections, or else just skim the article. If you find a good website, skim
through it or look for a site map that lists the areas in the website and use
that to create a summary. Read some of the information on the site to form an
evaluation.
Annotated Bibliography
Your assignment is to
prepare an annotated bibliography using APA documentation style. The assignment
has two parts: the list of sources and the annotation for each source.
The list of sources
must contain:
1. The subject of your research, which you
must state at the top of the page.
2. Seven sources of information about your
subject, including:
a. At least two articles from one or more
databases in the Hunt Library
b. At least one scholarly article.
3. All sources correctly documented in APA
style.
4. The entire references list correctly
formatted in APA style.
Special note: Wikipedia
is not an acceptable source for scholarly work. Do not use Wikipedia as a
source for this or any academic assignment.
The annotation for each
source must contain:
1. A short summary (1-3 sentences) of the
information found in the source.
2. An evaluation of the source's
credibility, reliability, currency, possible bias, and usefulness with respect to
your topic (2-3 sentences).
This assignment cannot
be revised. You are expected to use the Publication Manual of the American
Psychological Association to ensure your documentation is correct. If you have
any questions, please contact your instructor for guidance.
ENGL
123 Week 5 Assignment Help | Embry Riddle Aeronautical University
Summary and Strong
Response, Revised
Overview
It is time to submit
your final version of the Summary and Strong Response writing assignment.
For this assignment,
you will summarize an editorial (opinion) piece found using the Internet. Then,
you will write a letter to the editor in response to the editorial. It is not
necessary to respond to every point in the editorial—and probably not possible.
You may respond to only one point if you wish.
Note: Since this is a
personal response, you may use "I" in your writing.
Questions you might ask yourself:
What is the author
saying?
How does the author go
about saying it (i.e. the evidence, rhetorical strategies, and the like)?
What is your evaluation
of what is written and how it is written?
Directions
This assignment has two
parts: a summary of the editorial and a strong response. For the potential for
full credit for this assignment, you must do four things:
Summarize the editorial
in 150-175 words. Be sure you present the thesis and the major supporting
points in an objective manner (i.e. do not insert your opinions).
Identify the editorial
and author in the first sentence of your summary and include the link for your
readers.
Write a response to the
editor in 250-300 words. In your response, you may agree with one or two
points, but you must also show how you "resist" the text by
questioning it, or arguing with it or refuting it. It may be helpful to think
of your response as a reaction to how the writer was trying to influence your
thinking. Pay attention to the words used to name and describe, the details
included, and any comparisons made. (The letter-to-the-editor format assumes
readers have read the article, so you do not need to summarize it in the
letter.)
Correctly use
attributive tags in your response to indicate which ideas came from the press
release and which are your own.
Once you use the
feedback from your peers and instructor, submit your final version.
Save your assignment
using a naming convention that includes your first and last name and the
activity number (or description). Do not add punctuation or special characters.
ENGL
123 Week 5 Quiz 1 | Assignment Help | Embry Riddle Aeronautical University
Avoiding Plagiarism
Exercise
Plagiarism is using
someone else's words or ideas without giving credit. Most people understand that
quoting word-for-word without using quotation marks or naming the source is
plagiarizing, but many people do not know that plagiarism can occur even when
writers put ideas into their own words, if those ideas were lifted from a
source and not credited. And very few people understand how to avoid close
paraphrasing, another form of plagiarism.
You might be wondering,
"What do I not need to document?" You do not need to document common
knowledge, information that is readily available in numerous general sources
(i.e. dates, the number of months in a year, historical events, and the like).
You should not document your thesis statement, your topic sentences, and your
own insights and experiences. The best advice about avoiding plagiarism is:
When in doubt, document.
Review the following
pages in the Publication Manual of the American Psychological Association:
15-16 and 169-174.
Quiz Question
Information: There are seven short answer questions. A couple questions will
require your own ideas. There is no time limit; however, you may only take the
quiz one time. This will be graded as a pass/fail activity.
You must complete this quiz by the fourth day
of the module week. On the fifth day of the module week, your instructor will
post the correct responses. You will need to review the quiz to compare your
answers with the correct answers. Compare your answers and resolve any questions
with your instructor.
Question 1
Name three different acts
considered to be plagiarism.
Question 2
What is
self-plagiarism?
Question 3
Why is it plagiarism to
fail to enclose borrowed language in quotation marks?
Question 4
How might you avoid
plagiarizing when you are summarizing or paraphrasing a source?
Question 5
Is the following passage
plagiarized? Why or why not?
Question 6
Is the following passage
plagiarized? Why or why not?
Question 7
Plagiarism has been
described as cheating. Who gets cheated when a person plagiarizes? (Name at
least five individuals or groups and explain how they are cheated.)
ENGL
123 Week 5 Quiz 2 | Assignment Help | Embry Riddle Aeronautical University
Module 5 Quiz: In-text
Citation Exercise
A documentation style
has two parts: the list of references and the in-text citations. These two must
work hand-in-hand. The primary objective of an in-text citation is to provide
enough information so that the reader can go to the list of references and find
the source.
How does this work?
When you look for a source in the list of references, you (and anyone else who
is reading your work, like, say, your instructor) will look only at the first
piece of information in each listing on the references list. That means that
the in-text citation must always include the first piece of information about
that source in the list of references. Usually, this is the author's name.
Other information may be included as appropriate for a smooth sentence flow,
but you must always include that first piece of information that will be found
in the references listing for that source.
Refer to pages 174 -
179 "Citing References in Text" in the Publication Manual of the American
Psychological Association.
Quiz Question
Information: There are 10 multiple choice questions. There is no time limit;
however, you may only take the quiz one time. This will be graded as a
pass/fail activity.
You must complete this quiz by the fourth day
of the module week. On the fifth day of the module week, your instructor will
post the correct responses. You will need to review the quiz to compare your
answers with the correct answers. Compare your answers and resolve any questions
with your instructor.
Question 1
The student is
summarizing information that begins on page 39 and continues on page 40 in a
2016 article by Peter Louve. The student provides a page reference for this
summary because the article is long.
Question 2
The student is
summarizing information from paragraph 3 of an undated online article by Redd
Ryman. The article has numbered paragraphs but no page numbers.
Question 3
The student is quoting
from page 64 of a 2010 article, “Talking to the Dead,” by Max Carey. The list
of references contains another article, “The Man Who Loves to Bust Quacks,”
also written by Carey and also published in 2010.
Question 4
The student is quoting
from page 22 of a 2014 report by the National Science Board. No individual
author is given. The entry in the list of references begins like this: National
Science Board.
Question 5
The student is quoting
from page 54 of an article published in 2012 by Peter Hurtz.
Question 6
The student is quoting
from paragraph 1 of a 2017 online article by Mary Fejko. The article has
numbered paragraphs but no page numbers.
Question 7
The student is quoting
from page 8 of an article by two authors, Comer and Dinger, that was published
in 2016.
Question 8
The student is quoting
from page 28 of an article by Peter Gormely published in 2015.
Question 9
The student is
summarizing information from page 108 of a 2016 book with two authors, Samuels
and Logane.
Question 10
The student is
summarizing information from a 2017 article by Gary E. R. Schwartz, Linda G. S.
Russek, Lonnie A. Nelson, and Christopher Barentsen. This is the first citation
of the source in the paper.
ENGL
123 Week 5 Quiz 3 | Assignment Help | Embry Riddle Aeronautical University
Reference Exercise
Most style guides are
organized in similar fashion, with a directory of common models to consult as
you create a references list. Understanding how to use this directory is
crucial to being able to create a references list in the correct style. The
first point to understand is that the directory of models is organized
according to the category of source (book, periodical, etc.). So you must first
decide which category to look in, and then look for the best model to follow in
that category.
That said, sometimes
you will have to combine information from two or more models to get the correct
citation.
Examine the directory
of models in Chapter 7 (pages 193 - 198). Then, choose and follow the example
that matches your source the closest.
Quiz Question Information:
There are seven short answer questions. Each question presents reference
material information. You will create a properly formatted reference entry for
the given reference material information. This situation is somewhat
artificial, in that, if you had done the actual research, you would know what
category of source you had (book, periodical, etc.). However, for the purposes
of the exercise, the categories of sources are labeled and providing additional
information.
There is no time limit;
however, you may only take the quiz one time. This will be graded as a
pass/fail activity.
You must complete this quiz by the fourth day
of the module week. On the fifth day of the module week, your instructor will
post the correct responses. You will need to review the quiz to compare your
answers with the correct answers. Compare your answers and resolve any questions
with your instructor.
Question 1
Use the provided
information to create a properly formatted reference entry.
BOOK
Joseph Stanford
New York, New York
Aviation Publications,
Inc.
2017
Airports: Not As Safe
As You Think!
Question 2
Use the provided
information to create a properly formatted reference entry.
PERIODICAL [print]
“Dangers of Overhead
Luggage”
Applied Ergonomics
(magazine)
Adrian Safety
Pages 38-42
April 2016
Question 3
Use the provided
information to create a properly formatted reference entry.
PERIODICAL [print]
“An analysis of
injuries in the airlines”
Journal of Human
Factors and Ergonomics
Vol 6
Issue 7
Pages 102-105
2015
Willhelm Piper,
Marcelina Peerscope, Anheim Cessna, Radiance Necessity, Boris Overammergah,
Beatrice Porter, Calabash Piper, Martha Notwinger, and Calliope Flyer
Question 4
Use the provided
information to create a properly formatted reference entry.
ARTICLE FROM ELECTRONIC
SOURCE
“The Science Behind
Aviation Safety” [article title]
March 21, 2017
Pages 52-57
doi: 333.D8755
[document identifier from database]
Mr. Forthwright
Flybynight
Homeland Security
[journal title]
Retrieved August 1,
2017
Question 5
Use the provided
information to create a properly formatted reference entry.
ARTICLE FROM ELECTRONIC
SOURCE
The Washington Post
Retrieved from
http://www.washingtonpost.com/
“Enduring Security
Lines”
Howard H. Hope
April 21, 2016
Question 6
Use the provided
information to create a properly formatted reference entry.
REPORT FROM ELECTRONIC
SOURCE
Federal Aviation
Administration [organization name]
2025 Outlook: How Safe
will the Skies Be?
Undated
Retrieved May 28, 2017,
from http://www.faa.gov/outlook
Question 7
Use the provided
information to create a properly formatted reference entry.
INTERVIEW (Not Archived,
Recorded, or Transcribed)
Harold Wishiwashi
July 30, 2017
ENGL
123 Week 6 Discussion 1 | Assignment Help | Embry Riddle Aeronautical
University
Outline Activities:
Steps 1-5
Overview
For this activity, you
will create an outline, continue to revise it, and build upon it throughout the
week as described in the different steps below.
You will need to create
your initial post with your first outline per the instructions in Step 1 by the
third day of the module week. Then, you will reply to that initial post for
each of the following individual steps on subsequent days. Be sure the first
statement of your posts includes the title of the step you are posting, for
example "Step 2 - Outline: Providing Data/Evidence."
You will need to post
the outlines for all of the steps each day, so by the end of the module week
all of them will be posted. Be sure to follow the timeline and instructions for
each step below.
Outlines
Step 1 - Outline: Formulating
a Claim and Reasons
Read the Outline with
Reasons document and then post your claim and two or three reasons.
This will be your
initial post; all of the following posts you make will be a reply to this post.
Your Initial post due on the third day of the
module week.
Step 2 - Outline:
Providing Data/Evidence
Read the Outline with
Evidence document and research to find evidence to support your thesis and
reasons. Add to your outline at least one piece of evidence for each of your
reasons. Reply to your initial post and copy and paste your revised outline,
rather than attaching it.
Your second post is due on the fourth day of
the module week.
Step 3 - Outline:
Examining an Unstated Assumption (Warrant)
Read the Outline with
Unstated Assumption document and add to your outline the unstated assumption
for each of your reasons. Post the revised outline by replying to your initial
post and copy and paste your outline, rather than attaching it.
Your third post is due on the fifth day of the
module week.
Step 4 - Outline:
Identifying an Objection and Rebuttal
Read Outline with
Objection and Rebuttal document and add to your outline one objection to either
your thesis, one of your reasons, or a piece of your evidence, and add your
rebuttal to this objection. Post the revised outline by replying to your
initial post and copy and paste your outline, rather than attaching it.
Your third post is due on the sixth day of the
module week.
Step 5 - Outline: Using
Ethos, Pathos, and Logos
Note on your outline at
least one instance of each: ethos, pathos and logos. Remember that pathos can be especially
effective in your introduction and conclusion. Post the final revised outline
by replying to your initial post and copy and paste your outline, rather than
attaching it.
Your third post is due on the last day of the
module week.
Learn and Share activities: These activities
are set up using the discussion tool so you can share your activities with your
classmates. While replies to your classmates' posts are not required for these
activities, feel free to ask them questions or share further ideas. These
activities are graded as pass/fail. You will earn 100 points for completing the
activity or 0 points if you do not complete the activity.
ENGL
123 Week 6 Discussion 2 | Assignment Help | Embry Riddle Aeronautical
University
Logical Fallacies
In this blog entry, you
will identify and discuss logical fallacies.
Chapter 16 details ten
common logical fallacies: red herring, bandwagon, slippery slope, false
dichotomy, faulty analogy, ad hominem, false authority, questionable causality,
hasty generalization, and exaggerated danger. Your research may identify
others.
Start your blog by explaining,
in your own words, what logical fallacies are and why they should be avoided in
persuasive writing. For example, how might logical fallacies affect a writer's
appeal to ethos and logos? How is a fallacious argument different from a bad
argument?
Then, find and identify
at least three fallacies in one (or more) persuasive piece. Good places to
locate logical fallacies are in advertisements, political speeches, letters to
the editor, cartoons, and articles in magazines or newspapers. Name the fallacy
type and explain why the example is a fallacy (i.e. What is the flaw in the
reasoning?).
Lastly, discuss what
you learned from completing this blog activity.
Once you have posted
your blog, return to read and respond to at least two of your classmates' blog
posts.
ENGL
123 Week 7 Discussion | Assignment Help | Embry Riddle Aeronautical University
Module 7 Discussion:
Everyday Persuasion
Everyday Persuasion
We are bombarded every
day by persuasive messages, from commercials to advertisements to requests from
a boss or significant other. Share a time that you had to use your persuasive
skills, either in your personal or professional life. Briefly explain the
situation and the persuasive skills that you used. Lastly, reflect on the
effectiveness (or ineffectiveness) of those skills and if there was anything you
could have done differently.
Be sure to post your initial
post early in the week. After you have posted, go back to the discussion and
read several of your classmates' responses. Respond to at least two postings.
ENGL
123 Week 7 Assignment Help | Embry Riddle Aeronautical University
Module 7 Assignment
Peer Review: Classical Argument Position Paper Draft
“Criticism, like rain,
should be gentle enough to nourish a man’s growth without destroying his
roots.”
Review the instructions
for the Classical Argument Position Paper assignment. After reviewing Chapters
16 and 19 in your textbook from Module 6 Readings activity, use your outline
completed in the previous module to write a draft of the classical argument position
paper for instructor and peer review.
Directions
Assignment Submission
Once you have completed
your draft, submit your classical argument paper in this activity for your
classmates and instructor to review.
Save your assignment
using a naming convention that includes your first and last name and the
activity number (or description). Do not add punctuation or special characters.
You will submit your draft by the third day of
the module week to give adequate time for the review. Based on feedback from
your instructor and your classmates' peer reviews, you will revise and submit
the final version in Module 8.
Peer Review
On the fourth day of
the module week, after you have submitted your assignment, you will be assigned
to conduct a peer review on two of your classmates' papers. You must complete
the two peer reviews by the third day of the next module week (Module 8). This
will allow you and your classmates time to work on your paper and implement
feedback from your classmates and instructor.
Please consider the
following attributes upon submission of peer review:
• Always reread your
written observation before submitting.
• Give detail responses
that generate more in-depth conversations on the subject.
• Remaining
professional, discuss the strengths/weaknesses of the submission.
• Provide clear suggestions
and praise when necessary.
• State appropriate
feedback.
Comments
Post a Comment