Get help for EDU
694 Entire Course of
Ashford University. We
provide assignment, homework, discussions and case studies help for all
subjects of Ashford University for
Session 2018-2019.
We are
providing EDU 694 Homework help, Study material, Notes,
Documents, and EDU
694 Write
ups to the students of Ashford
University. Just question answer is one of the best assignment helper of
Advanced Studies in Introduction to EDU 694 Education studies Ashford
University (EDU
694).
Provides:
-
EDU 694 Week 1 Discussion 1 | Assignment Help | Ashford
University
Topic Selection
Your
written response to this discussion prompt assesses your ability to explain the
role of action research from the viewpoint of an educational professional. This
discussion also supports your achievement of Course Learning Outcome 2.
For this
discussion you will be choosing a topic to use for the balance of this course.
When you select a topic, think about how it supports your current or future
professional goals. Before selecting a topic, it is highly recommended that you
read the final assignment for this course. Doing so will give you a glimpse
into what is ultimately required for mastery of the course learning outcomes
and to assist in your planning for the upcoming weeks.
Initial
Post: After reading Chapter 1 of the course textbook, watching the Conscious
Educating videos on action research in an educational setting, Action Research
in the Classroom: Part 1Links to an external site. and Action Research in the
Classroom: Part 2Links to an external site., and reading the elaboration provided
with the Week One Instructor Guidance about action research, post a substantive
initial response fully addressing each of the following:
Part One:
After
reading Chapter One of the course text and watching the videos (Action Research
in the Classroom: Part 1 and Action Research in the Classroom: Part 2), in one
paragraph provide your initial thoughts about action research. What value do
you see in conducting action research in an educational setting? Provide
examples from both sources to support your discussion.
Part Two:
Select
one educational research-based topic that interests you from our course topics.
List the topic you select for instructor approval prior to moving on to the
next steps. The topics covered during this course include: implementing change
in an education-based organization, evaluating the impact of the applied
intervention, communicating outcomes, collaboration, and 21st-century
leadership practices (e.g., testing and assessment, educational standards,
educational technology, literacy strategies, culturally- and
linguistically-diverse students, safe classroom environments, disability
research in general, AD/HD, autism, emotional/behavioral disturbance,
intellectual disabilities or learning disabilities, etc.).
*Note:
Choose the topic that is in alignment with your current or future professional
goals. The topic you choose will be used throughout this course.
• Conduct
a scholarly search for a research resource via the Ashford LibraryLinks to an
external site.or another scholarly source. Please refer to the instructor
guidance for Week One for a detailed description of a “scholarly search.”
• Provide
the web link name of the research resource you chose to review.
• Next,
in one paragraph,
o
Describe the website that you reviewed (state, federal, blog, for profit or
nonprofit, etc.).
o Reflect
on one item you found most interesting in the website you reviewed.
•
Finally, in two to three sentences explain why you chose this particular resources
to review.
o How
does this topic support your current or future professional goals?
EDU 694 Week 1 Assignment Help | Ashford University
Finding
Nemo? No, Finding Research
This
assignment measures your ability on how to assess the quality of various
sources of information, distinguish peer-reviewed sources, and how to evaluate
their credibility for use in academic research. This assessment also supports
your achievement of Course Learning Outcome 1.
In this
assignment, you will be critically evaluating the quality and credibility of
various sources of information. More specifically, you will continue exploring
the Ashford University Library to locate both primary and secondary sources of
information appropriate for academic research that relate to the topic you
identified in this week’s discussion posting.
Instructions
First,
you will conduct a scholarly search using the key words “action
research”andyour chosen topic from Week One Discussion: Topic Selection (such
as testing and assessment, educational standards, educational technology,
literacy strategies, culturally and linguistically diverse students, safe
classroom environments, disability research in general, AD/HD, autism,
emotional/behavioral disturbance, intellectual disabilities or learning
disabilities, etc.) and the grade level of your current or future professional
goal. Your search should be conducted using a scholarly search option, such as
GoogleLinks to an external site.,BingLinks to an external site., YahooLinks to
an external site., or any other major search engine. For example, “action
research and AD/HD and first grade.” Be sure to take the time to inform
yourself on sound research sources including use of peer reviews as listed in
the recommended and required resources for the week.
· To get you started, view What is a
Scholarly Journal Article?Links to an external site. Next, you will analyze the
first five results that appear from your search in a table format using
Microsoft Word.
Then,
using the same keywords you used to search the Web, you will conduct a search
in the Ashford University Library using one of the academic databases (ERIC,
ProQuest, EBSCOhost, and so forth) and create a table such as the one below
using Microsoft Word. Finally, you will select two sources from either table
that you feel are the best overall based on currency, credibility, authority,
and academic integrity and construct a summary. For each article in your tables,
use the following format:
APA
Reference Entry
Author,
A. A., Author, B. B., & Author, C. C. (Year). Title of article. Title of
Periodical, volume number(issue number), pages. http://dx.doi.org/xx.xxx/yyyyy
Source Type
(e.g.,
journal article, magazine article, book, and so forth)
Annotation
(e.g.,
two to three sentences summarizing the contents of the source)
Written
Communication:
Using
support from your assigned reading, the Instructor Guidance, and the
discussions, submit the following for evaluation. Use the following guidelines
for creating your written assignment. If you have questions about the
assignment or the rubric, please contact your instructor using the Ask Your
Instructor discussion before the due date.
In your
paper,
· Web Search (3 points): Construct a
table that includes a 6th edition APA-formatted citation, source type, and a
two- to three-sentence annotation for five scholarly sources gathered from an
open web search.
· Library Search (3 points): Construct a
table that includes a 6th edition APA-formatted reference entry, source type,
and a two- to three-sentence annotation for five scholarly sources gathered
from a library search.
· Learning (2.5 points): In a paragraph,
explain what you learned through this process of selecting articles and what
was most informative for you about this experience.
The
Finding Nemo? No, Finding Research Assignment
· Must be three to four double-spaced
pages in length (not including title and references pages) and formatted
according to APA style as outlined in the Ashford Writing CenterLinks to an
external site..
· Must include a separate title page
with the following:
o Title of Finding Nemo? No, Finding Research
o Student’s name
o Course name and number
o Instructor’s name
o Date submitted
· Must use at least five scholarly
sources in addition to the course text.
o The Scholarly, Peer Reviewed, and Other
Credible SourcesLinks to an external site. table offers additional guidance on
appropriate source types. If you have questions about whether a specific source
is appropriate for this assignment, please contact your instructor. Your
instructor has the final say about the appropriateness of a specific source for
a particular assignment.
· Must document all sources in APA style
as outlined in the Ashford Writing Center.
· Must include a separate references
page that is formatted according to APA style as outlined in the Ashford
Writing Center.
Next
Steps: Review and Submit the Assignment
· Review your assignment with the
Grading Rubric to ensure you have achieved the distinguished levels of performance
for each criterion. Next, submit your document no later than Day 7.
Recommendation:
The MAED
and MASE programs provide the opportunity for you to create an online portfolio
that can be used in your career development and professional practice. Throughout
your respective programs, you will have various assessments that can be
included in this e-portfolio, and these will be finalized in the final capstone
course, Capstone 2: Culminating Project, EDU696. You may select this assignment
and subsequent coursework to include as work samples. Therefore, it is strongly
encouraged you save your coursework on a flash-drive (e.g., a USB removable
drive) or store in a cloud-based option such as Dropbox, Google Drive, or other
similar applications.
Success
Tip: Be mindful of the Week Six Final Project. The Week Six project involves
conducting a peer review of an action research proposal. Preparation for this
assignment must begin early to make certain you are planning ahead and saving
your work. Review the full instructions for the Week Six assignment for
specific information.
EDU 694 Week 2 Discussion 1
| Assignment Help | Ashford University
Action Research Selection
Your
written response to this discussion prompt assesses your ability to both
describe the action research proposal process and formulate evidence-based
recommendation for selecting an appropriate action research topic. This
discussion also supports your achievement of Course Learning Outcome 5.
According
to the North Central Regional Educational Laboratory (NCREL), “Action research
is inquiry or research in the context of focused efforts to improve the quality
of an organization and its performance. It typically is designed and conducted
by practitioners who analyze the data to improve their own practice,” (as cited
in Action Research, n.d., para. 1), As you read this week in the Instructor
Guidance and Chapter 3 of the your text, keep in mind the NCREL definition of
action research as you select your study to peer review for the Week Six assignment.
Initial
Post: Post an initial response that addresses the following areas:
• First,
select one action research study from your list of peer-reviewed sources from
the Week One assignment.
• Next,
post the full 6th edition APA reference entry for this selected source.
•
Finally, in two to three paragraphs, discuss why you chose this topic and in
particular this action research proposal. How does this topic support your
current professional role or future professional goals?
EDU 694 Week 2 Journal | Assignment Help | Ashford University
This
journal assesses your ability to apply collaboration and cooperation as it
relates to action research proposals. This assessment also supports your
achievement of Course Learning Outcome 5.
Instructions
using
support from your assigned reading, the Instructor Guidance, and the
discussions, submit the following for evaluation. Use the following guidelines
for creating your written assignment. If you have questions about the
assignment or the rubric, please contact your Instructor using the Ask Your
Instructor discussion before the due date.
In your
paper,
Choose
one topic (8 points) from below and reflect on the value of action research
within the education profession. Be sure to support your reflection with
information from the Lloyd (2002) article and your textbook.
• Improve
pre and in-service training, mentorship, and team building.
• Promote
the use of new and alternative methods for teaching.
•
Encourage teachers to organize their work in teams and to apply problem-oriented
teaching methods.
The
Journal Assignment
• Must be
two to three double-spaced pages in length (not including title and references
pages) and formatted according to APA style as outlined in the Ashford Writing
Center (Links to an external site.)Links to an external site..
• Must
include a separate title page with the following:
o Title
of Journal: Action Research
o
Student’s name
o Course
name and number
o
Instructor’s name
o Date
submitted
• Must
use at least three scholarly sources in addition to the course text.
o The
Scholarly, Peer Reviewed, and Other Credible Sources (Links to an external
site.)Links to an external site.table offers additional guidance on appropriate
source types. If you have questions about whether a specific source is
appropriate for this assignment, please contact your instructor. Your
instructor has the final say about the appropriateness of a specific source for
a particular assignment.
• Must
document all sources in APA style as outlined in the Ashford Writing Center.
• Must
include a separate references page that is formatted according to APA style as
outlined in the Ashford Writing Center.
Next
Steps: Review and submit the assignment
• Review
your assignment with the Grading Rubric to ensure you have achieved the distinguished
levels of performance for each criterion. Next, submit your document no later
than Day 7.
Recommendation:
The MAED
and MASE programs provide the opportunity for you to create an online portfolio
that can be used in your career development and professional practice.
Throughout your respective program you will have various assessments that can
be included in this e-portfolio, and these will be finalized in the final
capstone course, Capstone 2: Culminating Project, EDU696. You may select this assignment
and subsequent coursework to include as work samples. Therefore, it is strongly encouraged you save
your coursework on a flash-drive (e.g., a USB removable drive) or store in a
cloud-based option such as Dropbox, Google Drive, or other similar applications.
Success
Tip: Be mindful of the Week Six Final Project. The Week Six project involves
reflecting on an action research proposal. Preparation for this assignment must
begin early to make certain you are planning ahead and saving your work. Review
the full instructions for the week six assignment for specific information.
EDU 694 Week 3 Discussion 1 | Assignment Help | Ashford
University
Working
Together to Support Collaboration
In this
discussion, your instructor will assign and post your mock professional
learning community (PLC) group of approximately two to three peers. Once your
group has been identified, begin collaborating with the group in this
discussion and in the Ethics in Research discussion. In this discussion, your
first step is to get to know your partners in your mock PLC.
Initial
Response: In your assigned discussion group posting area, post an initial
response that addresses the following areas:
• Post a
brief introduction of your professional and/or educational background and
current or future goal within the education profession.
Group
Leader:As a group, identify a leader. The leader will then
•
Complete and attach the Group Agreement document .
• Post
your group name.
• List
each member of your group and which of the bulleted points listed in the Ethics
in Research Discussion each member of the group will be working on.
•
Identify what mode of communication you will use to work together to complete
and disseminate the discussion points. Use the Group Agreement document as your guide while collaborating in the
Ethics in Research Discussion.
EDU 694 Week 3 Discussion 2 | Assignment Help | Ashford
University
Ethics in Research
Your
written response to this discussion prompt assesses your ability to examine
ethical guidelines for conducting action research in the education profession.
This discussion also supports your achievement of Course Learning Outcomes 1
and 2.
Think
back to the courses you have taken that have given you a perspective on
co-teaching and collaboration, the sharing of knowledge with fellow faculty,
and using face-to-face, virtual, and blended communications. In essence, a PLC
consists of individuals with an interest in the same profession. The focus of a
PLC in the education field can be taking measures to ensure students learn,
creating a culture of collaboration in the school, school improvement, and more
(DuFour, 2004).
As an
education professional, you have been selected by the local university to
advise them regarding the creation of an IRB for action research proposals.
More specifically, as an education professional you have been selected to
participate with a group of other professionals to inform and persuade the
local university of why the incorporation of an IRB is of utmost importance.
To start
off this discussion, first view the Belmont Report, Ethical Principles and
Guidelines for the Protection of Human Subjects of Research (Links to an
external site.)Links to an external site..
• Next,
working in your mock PLC ( identified in the Working Together to Support
Collaboration Discussion) come up with a
supported argument based on personal experiences and scholarly literature,
including Chapter 4 of the Mertler (2014) text, in which you defend why
creation of an IRB board is needed at the local university As you formulate
your response keep in mind these key concepts ( respect for persons, benefice,
and justice, informed consent, assessment of risk and selection of subjects).
Discuss the purpose of creating an IRB. Highlight how the IRB is a way to
ensure that appropriate steps are taken to protect the rights and welfare of
humans participating as subjects in the research especially in regards to
special populations.
• Discuss
how the implementation of an IRB body will be established to protect the rights
and welfare of human research subjects recruited to participate in research
activities conducted under the auspices of the institution with which it is
affiliated.
* Note in
your Week Three Working Together to Support Collaboration, Discussion you
identified each member of your group and which of the bulleted points listed in
this discussion each member of the group will be working on.
To help
inform your response, the instructor will assign your PLC one of the following
studies:
• Berg,
J. (1996). Legal and ethical complexities of consent with cognitively impaired
research subjects: Proposed. Journal of Law: Medicine & Ethics, 24(1), 18-35.
•
Connelly, L. M. (2014). Ethical considerations in research studies. MedSurg
Nursing, 23(1). 54-55.
• Daley,
T., Singhal, N., & Krishnamurthy, V. (2013). Ethical Considerations in
Conducting Research on Autism Spectrum Disorders in Low and Middle Income
Countries. Journal of Autism & Developmental Disorders, 43(9), 2002-2014.
doi:10.1007/s10803-012-1750-2
• Irvine,
A. (2010). Conducting qualitative research with individuals with developmental
disabilities: Methodological and ethical considerations. Developmental Disabilities
Bulletin, 38(1-2), 21-34.
• Kanner,
S., Langerman, S., & Grey, M. (2004). Ethical considerations for a child’s
participation in research. Journal for Specialists in Pediatric Nursing, 9(1),
15-23.
•
Keteian, S. (2015). Ethical considerations in research: Focus on vulnerable
groups. Investigación y Educación en EnfermerÃa, 33(1), 164-172.
Initial
Post: Post an initial response that addresses the following areas:
* Note in your Week Three Working Together to
Support Collaboration Discussion One you
identified each member of your group and which of the bulleted points listed in
this discussion each member of the group will be working on.
• Discuss
the purpose of creating an IRB. Highlight how the IRB is a way to ensure that
appropriate steps are taken to protect the rights and welfare of humans
participating as subjects in the research especially in regards to special
populations.
• Discuss
how the implementation of an IRB body will be established to protect the rights
and welfare of human research subjects recruited to participate in research
activities conducted under the auspices of the institution with which it is
affiliated.
EDU 694 Week 3 Discussion 3 | Assignment Help | Ashford
University
Review of Ethics
In this
discussion, you will look at the action research proposal you selected in Week
Two and discuss ethical considerations of the research.
Initial
Posting:Post an initial response that addresses the following areas:
• Post
the full 6th edition APA reference entry from your Week One Topic Selection
discussion.
• Next,
in one paragraph, discuss any ethical considerations and concerns presented in
the research either explicitly or not explicitly stated (writing “There were
none” is not an option).
Guided
Response: Respond to at least two peers. In your responses, ask a question
about the ethical implications they found in their study. Compare it to your
own post and offer input as to how the considerations in light of the Belmont
Report should be taken into account. Though two replies is the basic
expectation, for deeper engagement and learning, you are encouraged to provide
responses to any comments or questions others have given to you, including the
instructor. Responding to the replies given to you will further the
conversation and provide additional opportunities for you to demonstrate your
content expertise, critical thinking, and real-world experiences with this
topic.
EDU 694 Week 4 Discussion 1 | Assignment Help | Ashford
University
Diversity
Through 21st-Century Teaching and Learning
Your
written response to this discussion prompt assesses your ability to evaluate
the effectiveness of 21st-century teaching and learning. This discussion also
supports your achievement of Course Learning Outcome 3.
There are
a broad range of experiences brought to the school every day by culturally,
linguistically, and ethnically diverse students. These unique diversities
compel the development and use of differentiated teaching strategies to target
each student as an individual. In this discussion, you will explore the concept
of supporting diversity through 21st-century teaching and learning.
Initial
Post: Post an initial response that addresses the following areas:
Select
three of the four prompts below, and then discuss how the Framework for 21st
Century Learning (Links to an external site.)Links to an external site. can be
applied to each prompt using specific examples of the actions you would take to
apply the framework. Your response to each of the three prompts should be one
paragraph.
• Analyze
how you can maintain high standards and demonstrate high expectations for all
ethnically, culturally, and linguistically diverse students in the classroom.
• Reflect
on ways in which you will choose culturally relevant curriculum and
instructional materials that recognize, incorporate, and reflect students’
heritage and the contributions of various ethnic groups.
• Discuss
how you would differentiate instruction for the inclusion of various learning
styles.
• Reflect
on ways in which you would modify instruction for students in your area of
specialization.
Guided
Response: Respond to at least two peers. Ask questions of your peers about
their responses to encourage further conversation. In your responses, consider
including a question about the inclusion of 21st-century skills in a diverse
classroom.
Though
two replies are the basic expectation, for deeper engagement and application of
the material, you are encouraged to provide responses to any comments or
questions
EDU 694 Week 4 Assignment Help | Ashford University
Visual
Interpretation
This
assignment is another opportunity to complete part of your final assignment:
the peer review. In this assignment you will be discussing and visually
representing your knowledge of data collection tools in the action research
proposal process. This assignment supports your achievement of Course Learning
Outcome 3.
Instructions
This
assignment is your chance to get creative. There are two parts to this
assignment.
In your
paper,
Part
One:Using a visual tool such as Smore or EDraw Max, create a visual with the
following:
• Types
(4 points): Depicts the different types of qualitative and quantitative data
collection techniques.
Part
Two:Provide a separate document that includes the following:
•
Characteristics (2 points): In one page discuss each type of data collection,
paying attention to the characteristics of each type (accuracy, credibility,
dependability, validity, and reliability).
• Report
Out (2 points): Skim your action research report, chosen in Week Two, for the
types of data used. Describe in at least one page the different types of data
chosen and report out on the findings.
The Visual
Interpretation Assignment
• Must be
three to four double-spaced pages in length (not including title and references
pages) and formatted according to APA style as outlined in the Ashford Writing
Center (Links to an external site.)Links to an external site..
• Must
include a separate title page with the following:
o Title
of Visual Interpretation
o
Student’s name
o Course
name and number
o
Instructor’s name
o Date
submitted
• Must
use at least three scholarly sources in addition to the course text.
o The
Scholarly, Peer Reviewed, and Other Credible Sources (Links to an external
site.)Links to an external site. table offers additional guidance on
appropriate source types. If you have questions about whether a specific source
is appropriate for this assignment, please contact your instructor. Your
instructor has the final say about the appropriateness of a specific source for
a particular assignment.
• Must
document all sources in APA style as outlined in the Ashford Writing Center.
• Must
include a separate references page that is formatted according to APA style as
outlined in the Ashford Writing Center.
Next
Steps: Review and Submit the Assignment
• Review
your assignment with the Grading Rubric to ensure you have achieved the
distinguished levels of performance for each criterion. Next, submit your
document no later than Day 7.
Recommendation:
The MAED
and MASE programs provide the opportunity for you to create an online portfolio
that can be used in your career development and professional practice.
Throughout your respective program you will have various assessments that can be
included in this e-portfolio, and these will be finalized in the final capstone
course, Capstone 2: Culminating Project, EDU696. You may select this assignment
and subsequent coursework to include as work samples. Therefore, it is strongly
encouraged you save your coursework on a flash-drive (e.g., a USB removable
drive) or store in a cloud-based option such as Dropbox, Google Drive, or other
similar applications.
Success
Tip: Be mindful of the Week Six Final Project. The Week Six project involves
conducting a mock peer review. Preparation for this assignment must begin early
to make certain you are planning ahead and saving your work. Review the full
instructions for the week six assignment for specific information.
EDU 694 Week 5 Discussion 1 | Assignment Help | Ashford
University
Planning
for All: Differentiating Instruction
Your
written response to this discussion prompt assesses your ability to discuss
teaching and learning with leadership. This discussion also supports your
achievement of Course Learning Outcome 3.
Teachers
have a powerful role in the classroom and larger school community. School
teachers, administrators, curriculum and instructional specialists, and
educators/trainers make hundreds of decisions a day; these decisions affect
many people. As such, it is important for educators to ground their decisions
according to the latest research and in alignment with the established vision
for their organization.
Initial
Post: Post an initial response that addresses the following areas:
Read
Phelps’ (2008) article titled “Helping teachers become leaders." Compare
his statement with at least two vision statements that you find via a Google
search. In the discussion forum, create your own vision statement. Phelps
provides an example in the article. As Phelps (2008) suggests, go beyond
mantras such as “all students can learn” (p. 119). The heart of your vision should address an
educational dilemma in a diverse learning context. For example, a possible dilemma
in the mantra “all students can learn” is that there are teachers who believe
that some students do not learn, which is indicative of a “one size fits all”
type of teaching. Your vision statement will address a problem you see in
education and describe how you choose to solve that problem. Reflect on how
your beliefs will influence your classroom practices. As Phelps (2008)
indicates, “Formulating one’s vision in writing makes its achievement more
likely” (p. 120).
Guided
Response: Answer any follow-up questions your instructor may have for you after
reading your post. Read your classmates’ posts and respond to at least three of
them. Ask questions that challenge their practices and beliefs while promoting
their growth and development. Comment on how your classmates’ vision statements
can help create a thoughtful, diverse community. If you came across a version
of a vision statement that you think would aid your peers, share it with them.
Though
two replies are the basic expectation, for deeper engagement and application of
the material, you are encouraged to provide responses to any comments or
questions.
EDU 694 Week 5 Discussion 2 | Assignment Help | Ashford
University
Role as a
Teacher-Leader or Teacher-Researcher?
Your
written response to this discussion prompt assesses your ability to evaluate
the role of teacher-leaders and teacher-researchers. This discussion also
supports your achievement of Course Learning Outcome 3.
Initial
Post: Post an initial response that addresses the following areas:
Read
Phelps’ (2008) article titled ”Helping teachers become leaders." In this
discussion forum, you will reflect upon your own leadership skills.
Choose
one of these options (You can respond to both and/or synthesize your thinking
around both concepts in order to further advance your thinking):
• Option
A:According to Danielson’s framework (as cited in Phelps, 2008), what are the
three areas of teacher-leaders’ influence? For each area, describe your
leadership capacity. Which area do you see as your strength and why? Which area
is your weakest and why?
• Option
B:According to Lieberman and Miller (as cited in Phelps, 2008), what are the
three main roles of teacher/educational-leader? For each role, describe your
own leadership capacity. Which role fits you the best and why? Which role is
most foreign to you and why?
Guided
Response: Answer any follow-up questions your instructor may have for you after
reading your post. Read your classmates’ posts and respond to at least three of
them. Add to their reflections by making connections or suggestions. Share
specific examples from your own personal and professional experiences.
Though
two replies are the basic expectation, for deeper engagement and application of
the material, you are encouraged to provide responses to any comments or
questions.
EDU 694 Week 6 Discussion 1 | Assignment Help | Ashford
University
Why Educators
Should Conduct Research
Your
written response to this discussion prompt is your time to reflect on the
action research cycle. This discussion also supports your achievement of Course
Learning Outcome 4.
Educators
need to conduct research in order to make effective decisions about student
learning and student achievement. In addition, teachers must be reflective
about their practice in order to make appropriate changes and accommodations,
especially for diverse student populations.
*Note:
there are two parts to this discussion.
Initial
Post: Post an initial response that addresses the following areas:
Part A:
Read the
following articles about being a reflective practitioner:
• "The articulated learning: An
approach to guided reflection and assessment"
• “The Role of Reflection in the
Differentiated Instructional Process” (Links to an external site.)Links to an
external site.
Using
information you gathered from the articles, provide an analysis of the
following questions:
• What does it mean to be a reflective
practitioner?
• Why should teachers be reflective?
• How would you describe yourself in
regard to being a reflective practitioner?
Part B:
Provide
an evaluation of this question from Barth (as cited in the Phelps, 2008): “How
much are you prepared to risk of what is familiar, comfortable, safe, and
perhaps working well for you, in the name of better education for others?” (p.
122). Reflect on current practices and how you can be a reflective change
agent. Think about the following questions:
• How will you use research to improve
your practice in order to facilitate student achievement?
• What two areas of practice in your
educational environment do you think need researching and why?
Guided
Response: After reviewing the initial posts, substantively reply to at least
two peers. Asking clarifying questions and sharing personal experiences are
excellent methods of extending the discussion.
Though
two replies are the basic expectation, for deeper engagement and application of
the material, you are encouraged to provide responses to any comments or
questions.
EDU 694 Week 6 Final Project Assignment Help | Ashford
University
Peer
Review
Throughout
his course you have been developing your skills in the area of action research.
You have had the opportunity to reflect on the action research process and how
it can support student populations in the field of education. You selected an
action research topic that was of interest to you, either in your current or
future professional setting, and had the chance to work collaboratively with
your peers in discussing the action research process.
The
purpose of this assignment is the culmination of the learning achieved in this
course through a real-world application of the content. This summative
assessment supports your achievement of Course Learning Outcomes 1, 2, 3, 4 and
5 [and the MAED Program Learning Objective 4, 6, 8, and 9; and MASE Program Learning
Outcomes 4, 6, 7 and 8].
For this
assignment you will be assuming the role of a peer reviewer. As you have read
in the Instructor Guidance, a peer reviewer is an independent expert in the field
who evaluates manuscripts for academic journals. When one becomes involved in
the peer review process, it can be an incredibly informative experience. There
are a myriad of reasons why one becomes a peer reviewer. First and foremost,
this professional contribution to the field is an excellent item to include on
your Curriculum Vitae often noted under the “service” section. Second, you have
the opportunity to read and learn from others’ cutting edge work. Finally, by
taking an objective and critical perspective reviewing others’ work, you can
hone your own teaching and professional skills. Bridging this real-life
experience with the theories of instruction in the virtual course environment,
this assignment mirrors a career-building experience.
Instructions
Using
support from your assigned reading, the Instructor Guidance, and the
discussions, submit the following for evaluation. Use the guidelines below to
create your written assignment. If you have questions about the assignment or
the rubric, please contact your Instructor using the Ask Your Instructor
discussion board before the due date.
Content
Expectations
*Note:
There are two parts to this assignment.
In your
paper,
Part
One:Using the rubric attached, analyze the research report you chose in the
Week Two Action Research Selection discussion to include
•
Reference entry (1 point): Provide the complete 6th edition APA citation for
the action research proposal you are reviewing.
• Title
(1 point): Provide the title of the research proposal. It is usually a
statement based on the research question—short and to the point.
•
Research Topic (3 points): Describe the specific topic to be studied in a
paragraph. (Be certain that the research question relates to the topic.)
•
Research Problem (2 points): Provide a brief statement that fully describes the
problem being addressed. Present this in one sentence or no more than one clear
concise paragraph.
•
Research Purpose (2 points): Write a brief statement that fully describes the
intent of the study or the reason for conducting the study. Present this in one
sentence or no more than one clear concise paragraph.
•
Research Participants (2 points):Describe in detail the participants of the
study.
•
Research Question(s) (2 points):List the primary research question and any sub
questions addressed by the proposed study. The primary research question should
flow logically from the problem statement and purpose statement and be very
similar in wording although phrased as a question. This may include alternative
and null hypotheses as appropriate.
•
Literature Review Section (2 points): Provide a brief overview of the
conceptual framework upon which the study is based. Identify the seminal
research and theories that inform the study. Discuss the topics and themes that
are used to organize the literature review.
•
Research Design (2 points): Describe the research design and state the type of
approach used (e.g., quantitative or qualitative).
• Ethical
Consideration (2 points): Describe all ethical considerations and provide a rationale
for the considerations.
•
Research Findings (2 points): Report all research findings and conclusions
found from the study.
• Need
for the Study (1 point): Describe the need for the study. Provide a rationale
or need for studying the particular issue or phenomenon.
•
Practical Implications (1 point): Describe any stated practical implications.
Part Two:
Narrative – Submit a separate document that includes the following elements:
•
Relevancy (3 points): In one page analyze how the study is relevant to your
current profession or future professional goals.
• Reflect
(2 points):In one page reflect on the process of reviewing a completed action research
proposal.
The Peer
Review Final Project
• Must be
seven to eight double-spaced pages in length (not including title and
references pages) and formatted according to APA style as outlined in the
Ashford Writing Center (Links to an external site.)Links to an external site..
• Must
include a separate title page with the following:
o Title
of Peer Review Final Project
o
Student’s name
o Course
name and number
o
Instructor’s name
o Date
submitted
• Must
use at least six scholarly sources in addition to the course text.
o The
Scholarly, Peer Reviewed, and Other Credible Sources (Links to an external
site.)Links to an external site. table offers additional guidance on
appropriate source types. If you have questions about whether a specific source
is appropriate for this assignment, please contact your instructor. Your
instructor has the final say about the appropriateness of a specific source for
a particular assignment.
• Must
document all sources in APA style as outlined in the Ashford Writing Center.
• Must
include a separate references page that is formatted according to APA style as
outlined in the Ashford Writing Center.
Next
Steps: Review and Submit the Assignment
• Review
your assignment with the Grading Rubric to ensure you have achieved the
distinguished levels of performance for each criterion. Next, submit your
document no later than Day 7.
Recommendation:
The MAED
and MASE programs provide the opportunity for you to create an online portfolio
that can be used in your career development and professional practice.
Throughout yourrespectiveprogram you will have various assessments that can be
included in this e-portfolio, and these will be finalized in the final capstone
course, Capstone 2: Culminating Project, EDU696. You may select this assignment
and subsequent coursework to include as work samples. Therefore, it is
stronglyencouragedyou save your coursework on a flash-drive (e.g., a USB
removable drive) or store in a cloud-based option such as Dropbox, Google
Drive, or other similar applications.
Comments
Post a Comment